
WEIGHT: 63 kg
Breast: SUPER
One HOUR:100$
NIGHT: +50$
Sex services: Massage professional, Uniforms, Humiliation (giving), BDSM, Spanking
Better to have semi-tiffed in piecemeal fashion over the course of a calendar year than never to have tiffed at all! It's the. NOTE: Bypass the preview essay and scoot down to the reviews by clicking here. Below is a recreation of what it might have looked like had I actually stayed at TIFF for more than 12 hours. It's sort of a dramatic reenactment, with the films having been seen over the course of months rather than days.
Just play along. You'll feel better. The point is, over the course of the past year, I've essentially, only half-consciously, been seeing mostly downloading the films that I would have seen in my original screening schedule.
This summer, rather than throw them into the general mix of monthly reviews, it occured to me that I could just place them in this format, where they could take on the air of a unique summer project.
I'd toyed around with this idea, but decided to run with it after reading Mark Peranson's article about film festivals in the most recent issue of Cineaste, where he concludes that "today it's possible that by year's end one could conceivably download or have someone send you via a file transfer system most of those mythical fifty films [agreed to be the key films of a given year], whether or not they have distribution, important sales agents, or widespread festival participation or buy them legally from other countries over the Internet, if one wanted to remain above board.
That's pretty much what I've done, and so, why should my site bear the conspicuous absence of TIFF coverage when a I actually went ; b I've seen or "watched," really all the films I would have seen had I "festivalled;" and c I'm more dedicated to this process than many critics who actually hung in?